Thoughts on the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 now that I’ve had some time to digest the news

BY

Published 9 Sep 2013

NSFW AI Why trust Greenbot

We maintain a strict editorial policy dedicated to factual accuracy, relevance, and impartiality. Our content is written and edited by top industry professionals with first-hand experience. The content undergoes thorough review by experienced editors to guarantee and adherence to the highest standards of reporting and publishing.

Disclosure

note3mini

It’s been five days since Samsung unveiled the Galaxy Note 3 in Berlin. I haven’t had a chance to use the device yet, but I have watched far too many hands-on videos from various media outlets and have read a hilarious number of articles written by journalists who have played with the device that I’m pretty sure I can come to a few conclusions which I can share on this website.

Let’s start with the obvious point, the size. Despite featuring a screen that’s nearly 0.2 inches larger than the Note II, the Note 3 is 1.3 millimeters narrower. And despite having a battery that’s 100 mAh larger than the Note II, the Note 3 is 1.1 millimeters thinner. This type of engineering talent is something I really appreciate. That being said, photos make the Note 3 look bigger than the Note II.

Which brings me to design. The original Note was an enlarged Galaxy S II. The Note II was an enlarged Galaxy S III. The Note 3 on the other hand, to me at least, looks nothing like the Galaxy S4. In fact, I’m pretty convinced it looks like the three year old Galaxy S II, but with some refinements that make it look modern. I obviously can’t comment on the fake leather until I touch it, but I’m open to it, though deep in my heart I would’ve preferred a material that’s a bit more like an iPhone 5 or Nokia Lumia 925. Maybe next year? That’s what the rumors seem to say.

Now as for the guts, the Note 3 blows the Note II out of the water. It’s easily going to be twice as fast. It also has 3 GB of RAM, which sounds a bit funny, but makes sense when you consider that 64-bit processors (which enable 4 GB of RAM) are still at least a year off. The screen, at 1080p, is something I also want to look at in person, because my Note II disappoints me. My Note II didn’t used to bother me, but then Samsung was kind enough to lend me a Galaxy Mega 6.3 for a month. That device used LCD technology, not AMOLED, so the colors looked completely different. Now I find myself in a situation where every time I use my Note II, I feel like I’m not getting the “right” mobile experience.

So will I buy the Note 3? Considering I bought the Note II in January, I should say no, but I’m incredibly tempted to say yes due to the larger screen in a smaller body, the improved AMOLED panel that’ll hopefully have better color reproduction, the crazy fast Snapdragon 800, because there’s no such thing as “enough” speed, and because every time I pick up my Note II now, it feels like an ancient relic from the past. I know how crazy that sounds, but Samsung has managed to do something only Apple has been able to do in the past.

They’ve made a one year old product look and feel like a piece of garbage.