admits Hangouts doesn’t use end-to-end encryption, opening the door for government wiretaps

BY

Published 12 May 2015

NSFW AI Why trust Greenbot

We maintain a strict editorial policy dedicated to factual accuracy, relevance, and impartiality. Our content is written and edited by top industry professionals with first-hand experience. The content undergoes thorough review by experienced editors to guarantee and adherence to the highest standards of reporting and publishing.

Disclosure

If you’re really worried the government may be keeping tabs on your conversations, then you’d best avoid Hangouts.

According to Motherboard, a representative confirmed that Hangouts conversations are only encrypted “in transit,” meaning after the message arrives at the intended recipient could access it if forced to do so by a government wiretap. 

The question arose from a Reddit AMA with two senior members of ’s public policy legal team. An AC representative pinned them down about encryption, but wasn’t able to get them to detail if all messages were encrypted from end-to-end.

Richard Salgado, ’s director for law enforcement information security, David eber, the senior privacy policy counsel, would only confirm the in-transit encryption. Salgado reaffirmed the government’s prerogative to order such surveillance: “There are legal authorities that allow the government to wiretap communications.”

In reality, such wiretaps are rare. ’s transparency report details only seven wiretap orders for nine accounts in the first half of 2014, the most recent data available because the U.S. government requires a six-month waiting period.

y this matters: Apple has touted the privacy of iMessage as another advantage to the security conscious over Android. Other messaging platforms, like the Cuban-backed Cyber Dust, also promise secrecy. may not see this extra step as necessary until a backlash arises from those who want more privacy from their Hangouts conversations.