Smartwatches like the G tch R are probably best suited for skilled craftsmen. I’m talking ironworkers, car mechanics, plumbers, stonemasons. These are the professions that make a man’s wrists buff burly, you’ll want the biggest wrist possible for a smartwatch this large. Still, if you have the bone muscle density to pull it off, you’ll be rewarded with the best Android ar watch available today.
Its size notwithsting, the G tch R has a look that sends all the right signals to sports watch traditionalists. st as importantly, the R’s battery life easily beats that of the Moto 360, its direct Android ar competitor. And there’s a lot to like about ’s astic OD display, too.
Available for $300 at AT&T stores this Friday, the G tch R is a hefty $50 more than the Moto 360, so fence sitters will face tough decisions on which watch to buy. But if the G tch R’s aesthetics immediately sing to you, the choice is clear. Based on looks performance alone, the G tch R is the Android smartwatch to beat.
A decidedly butch industrial design
tch aesthetics are subjective. You may be looking for something more classic-luxe, but I’m a big fan of ’s sporty-techy design. Some of ’s watch faces makes the G tch R look remarkably similar to a traditional analog chronograph, only those Android ar notifications at the bottom of the screen betray the R’s digital underpinning from 10 feet away.
That said, I’ll concede this isn’t a design for everyone. Absolutely nothing about the G tch R is feminine. employs big, chunky lugs for its strap attachment points, while this flourish might send all the right emotional signals to many watch enthusiasts, the lugs also add to the watch’s overall bulk. Measured edge-to-edge horizontally, the R is just a smidgen wider than 1.75 inches, the diameter of the Moto 360. But measuring the watch vertically, from lug to lug, the G tch R measures 2.25 inches.
I don’t find the dimensions overwhelming, I have the wrists of a writer, not a construction worker. But some folks will inevitably find the G tch R simply too large.
’s stainless steel case comes in an attractive if unremarkable flat black. The materials are solid reassuring, but aren’t particularly interesting, don’t exude h-crafted elegance. This is especially true of the the bezel around the display, which includes notation for the 15, 30, 45 minute marks.
Of bezels straps
The bezel notation is a nice touch that helps you tell the time when your analog-style watch face is in its dim, ambient mode with only white hs displayed. The notation also supports the sports chronograph aesthetic. But, overall, the bezel falls short of anything you’d find on a true luxury watch. I’d like to see more visual interest in the hour notation (maybe a bit of embossing or debossing instead of simple printing), even a rotating bezel like you’d see in a diving watch.
But, who knows, might want to discourage diving. The G tch R has an I7 rating, which means it can survive 30 minutes underwater—but only to a depth of one meter.
ke the Moto 360, the G tch R has a black leather strap that can be replaced with any stard 22mm watch b you choose. ere Motorola’s strap bears the Horween trademark, simply calls its strap “calf skin leather.” It doesn’t smell as leathery as Motorola’s (yes, I check these things), nor is it quite as soft or supple. Still, while ’s strap doesn’t ooze luxury, it’s far fancier than the rubber strap on the original G tch, far easier to put on than the maddening Samsung Gear ve strap.
Best Android ar display around
You have to have a round display. A round display screams luxury watch, while a rectangular display screams nerd watch—like one of those original D watches from the 70s. Most of us thought the Moto 360 would deliver everything we wanted in a round display, but it turns out there are two significant drawbacks.
First, Motorola’s 1.56-inch I D display isn’t a full circle. It has a 320×290 resolution thanks to a sliver of non-existent pixels at the bottom of the screen. This is where Motorola hides its display circuitry. Second, the Moto 360’s ambient mode is rather dim—extremely difficult to read unless you’re in a dark environment.
ckily for , the G tch R suffers neither problem.
The R has a 1.3-inch, 320×320 astic OD display. ke the Moto 360 display, it’s relatively easy to read in direct sunlight, fixing a horrendous problem suffered by the original G tch. But unlike the Moto 360, the G tch R’s display—proprietary technology—completes a full circle. opted to place its display circuitry elsewhere in the packaging, leading to a slightly smaller screen, a slightly bulkier case.
But I prefer the compromise, as the Moto 360’s dead space does bother me a bit. And this is really important: The G tch R is significantly brighter than the Moto 360 in ambient mode.
I really have only two gripes with the G tch R display experience: There’s no ambient light sensor (which would allow for an auto-brightness setting), the very last lines of text in Android ar’s context cards get trimmed off by the curvature of ’s display. Hopefully the text-snipping issue will be fixed with a software update, but even it’s not, I won’t grumble. This display is a winner, it appears to be kind to battery life, as well.
l-day battery life
It’s difficult to conduct empirical battery testing on a smartwatch. Ars Technica probably has the most scientifically defensible battery testing approach, but my methods are much less advanced. I simply used the G tch R for two days straight, hitting its display frequently, just as one does when playing with any new tech toy. My results were encouraging: The G tch R’s battery appears to have more than enough capacity to make it through a day of normal use.
I put the R on my wrist at 5:40 a.m. on Saturday morning (don’t ask). By the time I put it back in its charger at 10:04 p.m.—more than 16 hours later—it had 42 percent battery capacity. On Sunday morning, I started using the watch at 7:00 a.m. en it went back in its cradle at 10:15 p.m., after a much heavier day of use, it still had 21 percent remaining. Now, keep in mind, all of this testing was conducted with Android ar’s black–white ambient mode turned on. Toggling on the “always on” watchface kills battery life in the Moto 360, is a major reason why we gave Motorola’s watch such a bad review.
Yet, the G tch R was able to withst the punishment of ambient mode, battery life should last even longer when I begin using the watch as a normal smartwatch, not a constantly engaged test subject. It’s important to note the G tch R has a relatively modern 1.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor, whereas the Moto 360 has a 4-year-old ( certainly less efficient) TI OMA630 chip.
Toss in a larger battery capacity (410mAh for ; 320mAh for Motorola), along with a special “power save mode” when the OD display is running in ambient mode, you have the makings of a tenable all-day affair. ed, we really shouldn’t be celebrating just a single reliable day of battery life. But this is 2014, battery tech remains the biggest challenge facing all wearable devices.
nky step altitude data
The G tch R comes with 18 watchfaces, a number of them include digital versions of complications you might find in a high-end chronograph. One face shows the current moon phase, while another renders the current time, plus two world clocks. My favorite face is called Hiking. It displays your current step count altitude, but while it looks great, hints at the awesome potential of smartwatches, ’s performance let me down.
On my first day of testing, the G tch R step count was completely divorced from reality. I spent a good portion of the day on my feet, finished with 15,705 steps according to my wbone U4. But the G tch R only recorded 5,540 steps, a preposterous under-tallying, during the exact same period. Numbers were much more consistent by end-of-day Sunday, with the U4 logging 8,676 the G tch R reporting 8,385. Still, the disparity of the previous day remains troubling.
Then there’s the watch’s altitude reporting, which keys into a built-in barometer, is an “estimated value based on atmospheric pressure at current location.” On two consecutive days, I hiked to the very top of Mount Davidson. On Saturday, it showed a maximum elevation of 263 feet. On Sunday, the watch reported 282 feet at the exact same spot. The difference between the two recordings isn’t that alarming. I’m much more concerned by the fact that Mount Davidson summits at 928 feet.
On the plus side, the watch’s built-in heart rate monitor was notably consistent with numbers reported by ’s Heart Rate Earphones, a great new gadget that delivers the accuracy of a chest-strap heart rate monitor. Of course, you can’t get an accurate reading during exercise; instead you have to stop working out, keep your wrist perfectly still. But as you can see from the photo below, when I stopped to check my B in the middle of an elliptical machine session, the watch reported the exact same number as ’s Earphones.
could really complete its quantified-self promise by finally making a ar app for the heart-rate earphones: I want real-time continuous heart-rate numbers on my wrist. Fixing those broken step counts wouldn’t hurt either. Oh, as long as it’s updating its firmware, should also work on a fix for the G tch R’s turn-wrist-to-wake gesture. System operation was generally trouble-free, I never once lost my smartphone Bluetooth connection during three days of testing. Still, it’s a pain in the ass when the watch won’t wake with a flick of the wrist.
The bottom line
Small quibbles aside, I think I’ve finally found an Android ar watch that I’m willing to slap on my wrist every day. It doesn’t have the luxury build quality of my TAG Heuer Formula 1. And lacking mechanical movements, it doesn’t feel like it “has the h of people in it.”
But Android ar is an incredibly useful OS if you’re already vested in Now the rest of the universe—the system’s notifications context streams really can add new convenience to life. The G tch R delivers all of this in a reasonably attractive package that’s reasonably easy to read lasts for a reasonably long time. It certainly won’t be the best Android ar watch we’ll ever see, because ’s platform is still so immature, we all want more than just reasonably good performance.
Still, the G tch R moves Android ar ever-so-closer to the enchanting productivity lifestyle promises that made at its I/O developer’s conference this year. At $300, the watch costs far less than a true analog luxury watch (I personally peg that threshold at $550), instead ls firmly in the “pretty expensive for yet another mobile gadget on my person” territory.
It’s laden with a price tag that discourages impulses buys, but if you’re absolutely certain you want an Android ar watch, dig ’s design, I recommend the G tch R. On the flip side, if you’re hemming hawing, play it safe: it to read our review of Sony’s Smartwatch 3, which is just around the corner. It doesn’t have a round display, nothing about its aesthetics immediately strike an emotional chord in me. But Sony’s model costs just $250 has onboard G— that’s a feature none of the existing ar watches can add in a software update.
You can read my initial first impression of the G tch R here.